Analogical Inference Deduction Impact on Deriving Jurisprudential Fundamental Rulings: An Applied Theoretical Study

Abstract

This study aimed to define the nature of analogical inference deduction and explain its different types of precedents inference, highlighting reasons behind its uses and various forms. It also seeks to provide a historical overview of the beginning of using analogical inferences in legal deduction within the framework of Jurisprudence Principles and fundamentals, illustrating the extent of its impact on deriving fundamental jurisprudential rules deduction.  The study consists of an introduction and four sections. The first section focusing defines the analogical inference deduction and its relationship with similar terms. The second section addresses the different types of analogy inference deduction based on various considerations. The third section discusses the reasons behind employing analogical inference similar past ruling and the historical usage of this concept in Jurisprudence Fundamentals and principles deduction. The fourth section deals with applied aspects of rule deriving by comparison. The inductive and analytical methodology was adopted. The study key findings showed that inference analogy comes in different forms.  It was also revealed that abstract logical analogy was frequently used by  jurisprudence principles jurists in their deductions and discussions compared to verbal analogy.