Monopolizing the Victuals at the Epidemic Time: A Jurisprudence Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35696/.v1i16.671Keywords:
Monopoly of Powers, Comparative Jurisprudence, Covid 19, Epidemic, SavingAbstract
This research addresses the judgment on (monopolizing victuals at the time of pandemic) and its importance is taken into consideration due to the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19). In this research, the meaning of pandemic and monopolism are defined and explored. The research has also addressed the types of supplies that are forbidden to monopolize, and what is the judgment on monopolizing food, medicine, and medical equipment. The research has also clarified when controlling victuals is considered to be monopolization. Then the researcher has explained the correlation based on "harm to be removed" as a monopolization. The research has also explored how the Islamic law has removed the harm from people in need. Then the research ends with what the ministry of commerce has done to prevent monopolization and punish the monopolists to protect the consumer's and the merchant's rights equally.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2020-09-01
Issue
Section
1
License
Copyright (c) 2021 إبتسام بنت محمد الغامدي (مؤلف)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing
For all articles published in journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
How to Cite
Al-Ghamedi, I. B. M. . (2020). Monopolizing the Victuals at the Epidemic Time: A Jurisprudence Comparative Study. Journal of Arts, 1(16), 352-373. https://doi.org/10.35696/.v1i16.671
Similar Articles
- Nawal Bint Saeed Bin Omar Badoghaish, Rulings Related to Friday Prayers in Times of the Epidemic – A Comparative Jurisprudential study , Journal of Arts: No. 16 (2020)
- Hasil Bin Maadi Mohammed Al-Ahmari, Powers of Council of Universities in the Light of the Saudi Universities System and Islamic Jurisprudence. , Journal of Arts: No. 23 (2022)
- Musab Omar Al-Hasan Taha, Yaaqob Ali Mahyoub Al-Wahsh, Ruling on khul’ in the Islamic Jurisprudence and Law: A Comparative Jurisprudential Study of the Yemeni and the Sudanese Personal Legal Status , Journal of Arts: No. 19 (2021)
- Abdulaziz Bin Abdulrahman Bin Muhammad Al-Fayez, The Impact of Corona Epidemic on some of the Rulings of Ṣalāh: A Jurisprudential and Comparative Study , Journal of Arts: No. 21 (2021)
- Adel Bin Malfi Bin Musnad Al-Alawi Al-Awfi, Jurisprudential Issues Determined by a Month in Worship Jurisprudence: A Comparative Jurisprudential Study , Journal of Arts: Vol. 13 No. 4 (2025)
- Bagash Sarhan Mohammed Al-Mekhlafi, Provisions of the Option of Defect in the Yemeni Civil Law No. (14) Issued in (2002) in the Light of the Four Doctrines , Journal of Arts: No. 15 (2020)
- Abdul Karim Abdulhamid Al-Khalaf, A Comparative Research of the Rule of Commitment and Disposition of the Individual Will in Islamic Jurisprudence , Journal of Arts: No. 00 (2001)
- Hasal Madi Al-Ahmari, Begging and its Jurisprudential Regulations in Islamic Jurisprudence and the Saudi System: A Comparative Study , Journal of Arts: Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024)
- Yahya Mohammed Al-Ameen Al-Hasan Ibrahim, The Rulings of the Judge in the Malikī Jurisprudence A Comparative Jurisprudential Study with Reference to the Book Entitled al-Mudawanah , Journal of Arts: No. 23 (2022)
- Manal Saleem Rouifed Assa'edi, The effect of a wife's work on Marital Alimony: A Comparative Jurisprudence Study , Journal of Arts: No. 13 (2019)
1-10 of 168
Next
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.


















