Discretionary Punishment of Incompetent Persons in Islamic Jurisprudence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35696/.v1i18.696Keywords:
Discretionary punishment, incompetence, fulfillment, damage warrantyAbstract
The research aims at studying the Ta’zeer (discretionary punishment) of incompetent persons like the insane and child and stating its ruling in Islamic jurisprudence. It discusses the conditions that must be considered while applying the discretionary punishment to the incompetent person and its enforcement in a way that compensates for the damage. The research includes an introduction, three sections, and a conclusion. The study has concluded the following: An incompetent person is the one who is incapable of carrying their responsibilities such as a mentally incompetent person and child. Then, there is no obligation of legislation rights from or toward them. All Islamic Jurists agreed on the punishment of incompetent persons for correctional purposes. The discretion punishment of an incompetent person is bounded by specific conditions. The discretionary punishment aims to prevent any harm to others and to preserve the incompetent person's rights.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2021-03-01
Issue
Section
1
License
Copyright (c) 2021 هند سعد سعيد القحطاني (مؤلف)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing
For all articles published in journal, copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.
How to Cite
Al-Qahtani, H. S. S. (2021). Discretionary Punishment of Incompetent Persons in Islamic Jurisprudence. Journal of Arts, 1(18), 272-295. https://doi.org/10.35696/.v1i18.696
Similar Articles
- Naif Mubarak Ali Al-Qahtani, Discretionary Punishment Legislation and its Impact on Saudi Legal System and Islamic Jurisprudence , Journal of Arts: Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025)
- Muṭea Mothana Aḥmed Moḥammad Al-Sarawi, Emergent Doubt and its Impact on Criminal Punishment: A Comparative Jurisprudential Study with Yemeni Law , Journal of Arts: Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025)
- Ali Musa Ali Faqihi, Moral Penalties in Criminal Cases and their Applications in Criminal Courts in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia , Journal of Arts: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025)
- Anas Ahmad Haj Zeidan, World Heritage Sites in Danger in Northwestern Syria: The High Mountain Park No. (6) , Journal of Arts: Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025)
- Massad Ahmed Al-Najjar, Causes and Prevention of Mental Disorders from an Islamic Perspective , Journal of Arts: No. 1 (2002)
- Attia Bin Abdullah Al-Harthy, Islamic Dawa’a-related goals for natural resources preservation , Journal of Arts: Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023)
- Munira Hishbil Shafi Al Eyaf Al-Qahtani, A Critical Inspection Study of Ibn Al-Ahdal’s Book Iddat Al-Mansukh min Al-Hadith ala ma Akhbara bihi Ba‘dh Ahl Al-Hadith (Methods for Identifying Abrogated Ḥadiths According to Select Hadith Scholars) , Journal of Arts: Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025)
- Ahmed Bin Haitham Bin Attia al-Juhani, The Transaction of ʻArayā A Jurisprudential Comparative Study , Journal of Arts: No. 23 (2022)
- Ahmed Saleh Qatran, The Rule of Preference and its Applications in the Saudi Regulations; Law of Criminal Procedures as a Model , Journal of Arts: No. 14 (2020)
- Jamal Mohammed Ahmed Hajer, The Scholar Muhammad bin Ibrahim al-Wazir al-Yamani , Journal of Arts: No. 7 (2018)
1-10 of 20
Next
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.


















