Fundamental jurisprudence forbiddance rules impact on other Islamic Fiqh aspects A study of select models

Abstract

This study aims to highlight the forbiddance form implying prohibition and identify some clear evidence which suggest non-prohibition, elucidating some aspects of jurisprudence principles based on this principle. The inductive approach was followed in the study. The study comes in an introduction and three chapters. The first chapter dealt with prohibition concept. The second chapter discussed the existing clear evidence of the jurisprudence principle rule. Chapter three focused on prohibition as well as non-prohibition forms and instances. It was concluded that forbiddance implies prohibition; it does not mean something else without clear connection evidence. Any form suggesting withholding or refraining from something is deemed a prohibition. Forbiddance form can be a non-prohibition one. The study revealed that prohibition and /or forbiddance entails immediate presumption continuity and frequent occurrence. It was also concluded that forbiddance form lacks prohibition evidence, suggesting non-prohibition if linked to a clear connection evidence. Forbiddance is imbedded in all acts of worships, transactions and ethics.