Filtration and Subjunction between Rhetorical Guidance and Jurisprudential Rulings in Quran Verses Composition

Abstract

This study investigates two main issues: the first pertains to the filtration of rhetorical aspects to substantiate jurisprudential rulings within Quranic composition, while the second explores the necessity of jurisprudential rulings in determining rhetorical aspects in Quranic composition. The first dimension encompasses rhetorical techniques such as ellipsis, definiteness and indefiniteness, syntactic ordering (advancement and postponement), stylistic consistency, and contextual usage. The second aspect includes rhetorical devices such as ellipsis, affirmation, the use of nominal and verbal sentences, conjunction, elaboration, literal and figurative expression, pairing, interweaving, and Quranic rhyme. The study consists of an introduction and two main sections. Section one examines the influence of rhetorical guidance in filtering jurisprudential rulings within Quranic composition. Section two analyzes the role of jurisprudential rulings in necessitating rhetorical aspects in Quranic composition. Key findings revealed that the majority of evidence supporting the interplay between rhetorical guidance and jurisprudential rulings in Quranic composition is derived from the science of meanings (Semantics), followed by the science of Rhetoric, and the science of Eloquence. Furthermore, verbal parallels in Quranic composition play a significant role in elucidating the relationship between rhetorical guidance and jurisprudential rulings.