Cited Morphological Agreement on Nouns

Abstract

This paper titled "Cited Morphological Agreement on Nouns", consists of an introduction, three sections, and a conclusion. The introduction addresses the significance of the study, the research methodology, and the objectives of collecting all cited cases of morphological agreement on nouns, along with the evidence provided by morphologists. The study has revealed several conclusions, the most notable being that cases agreed upon by morphologists are considered to have strong linguistic evidence and can be invoked unanimously. This paper cites 27 morphological noun cases agreed by morphologists. The terms of this agreement can be explicit or implicit and are often intended to reflect the agreement of both Basrans and Kufis, as well as grammarians. Sometimes, these agreements are made in response to anomalies in the rules, such as an agreement to deviate from the original. It is possible that one of the scholars violated this agreement, but their violation may have been overlooked due to the weakness of their argument or measurement. Additionally, There may be other issues in which the morphologists and grammarians did not convey an agreement or consensus due to the obviousness of the issue or because it is one of the morphological foundations about which no one disagreed.