Investigating Cohesive Devices in The Lucy Poems Using the Hallidayan Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53286/arts.v7i2.2524Keywords:
Language Learning, Cohesive Devices, Hallidayan Model, The Lucy PoemsAbstract
Using the Hallidayan model, this research investigates the usage of cohesive devices in Wordsworth’s The Lucy Poems, analyzing how these linguistic aspects contribute to the overall coherence and meaning of the text. This study also aims to seek whether the students enrolled in a Discourse Analysis course can identify the cohesive devices in The Lucy Poems. A total of 26 students identifying cohesive devices from literary texts served as the study's data, with a specific focus on the top six students whose identification of cohesive devices in the selected poem, The Lucy Poems, was analyzed and compared to the overall cohesive devices present in that poem to highlight the potential of poetry as a viable resource for teaching cohesive devices. Furthermore, the findings from the top five students (the primary data) were juxtaposed with the identifications made by 20 other students (the secondary data) who analyzed short stories and fiction. This descriptive qualitative study revealed conjunctions, references, and substitutes are all recognized more thoroughly than ellipses in the selected poems. The study found about 55% of references, 32.35% of conjunctions, and 11.34% of ellipsis in The Lucy Poems. 50% of the students identified 100% of substitutions, more than 80% of conjunctions, and 67% identified more than 65% of references, whereas only 33% could identify 15% of ellipsis in Lucy’s poems. Moreover, understanding cohesive devices helps students analyze and evaluate information more efficiently. This study implies specific literary pieces might be provided to facilitate a thorough review of grammatical cohesive devices. The comparison between the primary and secondary data claims that ESL students are yet to learn the mechanics of text linkage through ellipsis, and more efforts should be made to teach the ellipsis to raise students' competency levels.
Downloads
References
Abdi Tabari, M., & Wind, A. (2023). Dynamic development of cohesive devices in English as a second language writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0205
Al-Bahla, A. M. ., & Asaba, A. A. . (2019). The Indicative Expression in ( Thamarian joke). Journal of Arts, 1(11), 46–83. (In Arabic), https://doi.org/10.35696/.v1i11.603
Alotaibi, A. H. E. . (2023). The Effect of L1 Negative Transfer on EFL Saudi Students’ Use of Grammar in Writing. Arts for Linguistic & Literary Studies, 5(4), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.53286/arts.v5i4.1677
Cummings, M., & Robert, S. (1983). The language of literature. Pergamon Press.
Dan, L. (2019). An analysis of the cohesion devices in the road not taken. Frontiers in Educational Research, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.020610
Alshalan, A. (2024). Analytical Imagination: An Exploration of Imagination in Ancient and Contemporary Writings. Arts for Linguistic & Literary Studies, 6(1), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.53286/arts.v6i1.1800
Gutwinski, W. (1976). Cohesion in literary texts: A study of some grammatical and lexical features of English discourse. Mouton.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Edward Arnold.
Hodges, B. D., Kuper, A., & Reeves, S. (2008). Discourse analysis. BMJ, 337, a879. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a879
Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. Routledge.
Johnson, L. (2023). Cohesive devices as structural elements in poetic discourse. Poetics Today, 44(2), 177-195.
Locke, T. (2004). Critical discourse analysis. Continuum International Publishing Group.
McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Rahman, M.M. (2023). Can Grammarly be Implemented as an English Writing Tool? International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis. Vol. 6(4). 1570-1575.
Rahman, M.M. (2021). Using Blended Approach for EFL Learning: A Step towards 21st Century Classrooms. World Journal of English Language. Vol. 11(2). 13-18.
Shet, J. P. (2021a). Investigating cohesive devices in Sarojini Naidu’s Songs of Radha. Elementary Education Online. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.06.043
Shet, J. P. (2021b). Identification of substitution and ellipsis in Leo Tolstoy’s short story by English language major students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 1075-1085. https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.75
Shet, J. P. & Kumar. T. (2021a). Cohesive ties in Lucy Maud Montgomery’s Anne of Green Gables. Asian ESP Journal, 17(4), 3. https://www.asian-esp-journal.com/volume-17-issue-4-3-may-2021/
Shet, J. P. & Kumar.T. (2021b). Identification of cohesive devices in discourse analysis projects of regular versus online class students. Asian ESP Journal, 17(4), 3. https://www.asian-esp-journal.com/volume-17-issue-4-3-may-2021/
Shet, J. P & Ayed. M.A. (2022). Cohesion in Shakespearean Sonnets and Sarojini Naidu’s Fifty Poems Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban). Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 41(04), 107–108. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/B73HS
Shet, J.P, Jayalakshmi, V., Deshpande, S. & Sasirekha. (2023). English Language and Linguistics - Sluiced, Simpler, Silent Syntax- Is Ellipsis Evasive? Machine Intelligence Researches. https://machineintelligenceresearchs.com/article/view/Abstract-9230.phpVol.17Machine Intelligence Research7.7 No.2
Simpson, Paul. (1997). Language through Literature: An Introduction. London: Routledge. pp. xiv+223, ISBN 0 415 14964 9.
Smith, J. (2022). Cohesion and meaning: Analyzing cohesive devices in modern poetry. Journal of Literary Studies, 45(3), 215-230.
Allah, M. J. M. A. (2019, July 20). Investigating Cohesive Devices in Wordsworth Poetry. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies, 3(1)157-177.
Nordquist, R. (2020). August 28). Ellipsis: Definition and examples in grammar. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/ellipsis-grammar-and-rhetoric-1690640
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright and Licensing
copyright is retained by the authors. Articles are licensed under an open access Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. In addition, the article may be reused and quoted provided that the original published version is cited. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work.























